AI and data stack advisories

Severe, 6 weeks1498Projects326

1498 severe, 6 weeks · 326 projects

Open WebUIGHSA-jjp7-g2jw-wh3j

Open WebUI's process_files_batch() endpoint missing ownership check, allows unauthorized file overwrite

Open WebUI

CVE-2026-28788 · Published Mar 27, 2026 · updated Jul 13, 2026

High7.1
Fix: upgrade to 0.8.6 or later
GitHub advisory

Summary

Any authenticated user can overwrite any file's content by ID through the POST /api/v1/retrieval/process/files/batch endpoint. The endpoint performs no ownership check, so a regular user with read access to a shared knowledge base can obtain file UUIDs via GET /api/v1/knowledge/{id}/files and then overwrite those files, escalating from read to write. The overwritten content is served to the LLM via RAG, meaning the attacker controls what the model tells other users.

Details

The process_files_batch() function in backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py appears to be designed as an internal helper. The knowledge base router (add_files_to_knowledge_batch() in knowledge.py) imports and calls it directly after performing its own ownership and access control checks. The frontend never calls the retrieval route directly; all legitimate UI flows go through the knowledge base wrapper.

However, the function is also exposed as a standalone HTTP endpoint via @router.post(...). This direct route only requires get_verified_user (any authenticated user) and performs no ownership check of its own:

```python

for file in form_data.files:

text_content = file.data.get("content", "") # attacker-controlled

file_updates.append(FileUpdateForm(

hash=calculate_sha256_string(text_content),

data={"content": text_content}, # written...

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
open-webui
PyPI
< 0.8.60.8.6
Details and references

### Summary Any authenticated user can overwrite any file's content by ID through the `POST /api/v1/retrieval/process/files/batch` endpoint. The endpoint performs no ownership check, so a regular user with read access to a shared knowledge base can obtain file UUIDs via `GET /api/v1/knowledge/{id}/files` and then overwrite those files, escalating from read to write. The overwritten content is served to the LLM via RAG, meaning the attacker controls what the model tells other users. ### Details The `process_files_batch()` function in `backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py` appears to be designed as an internal helper. The knowledge base router (`add_files_to_knowledge_batch()` in `knowledge.py`) imports and calls it directly after performing its own ownership and access control checks. The frontend never calls the retrieval route directly; all legitimate UI flows go through the knowledge base wrapper. However, the function is also exposed as a standalone HTTP endpoint via `@router.post(...)`. This direct route only requires `get_verified_user` (any authenticated user) and performs no ownership check of its own: ```python for file in form_data.files: text_content = file.data.get("content", "") # attacker-controlled file_updates.append(FileUpdateForm( hash=calculate_sha256_string(text_content), data={"content": text_content}, # written to DB )) for file_update, file_result in zip(file_updates, file_results): Files.update_file_by_id(id=file_result.file_id, form_data=file_update) # ^^^ no ownership check ``` There is no verification that `file.user_id == user.id` before the write. Any authenticated user who knows a file UUID can overwrite that file. **How an attacker obtains file UUIDs:** Same as with read access, any user who can see a knowledge base can retrieve file IDs for every document in it via `GET /api/v1/knowledge/{id}/files`. In deployments where knowledge bases are shared across teams, this gives any regular user a list of valid targets. **Suggested fix:** Add an ownership check before writing: ```python for file in form_data.files: db_file = Files.get_file_by_id(file.id) if not db_file or (db_file.user_id != user.id and user.role != "admin"): file_errors.append(BatchProcessFilesResult( file_id=file.id, status="failed", error="Permission denied: not file owner", )) continue ``` **Classification:** - CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key - OWASP API1:2023: Broken Object Level Authorization Tested on Open WebUI **0.8.3** using a default Docker configuration. ### PoC **Prerequisites:** - Default Open WebUI installation (Docker: `ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main`) - An admin or user creates a knowledge base with shared read access and uploads a file - A regular user account exists (the attacker) **Obtaining the file UUID (attacker):** ``` GET /api/v1/knowledge/{kb_id}/files ``` This returns metadata for all files in the KB, including their UUIDs. **Exploit (attacker):** ```bash python3 poc_exploit.py --url http://<host>:3000 --file-id <target-file-uuid> -t <attacker-jwt> ``` The PoC script: [poc_exploit.py](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25470374/poc_exploit.py) 1. Authenticates as the attacker 2. Overwrites the target file via `POST /api/v1/retrieval/process/files/batch` with a canary payload containing a unique marker string 3. Reads the file back and confirms the attacker's content replaced the original **Verifying RAG poisoning:** After the overwrite, log in as any other user, start a chat with the poisoned knowledge base attached, and ask about the document. The model's response will include the attacker's canary string (`BOLA-<marker>`), confirming that attacker-controlled content reached the LLM and influenced the response. No special tooling is required. The script uses only Python 3 standard library (`urllib`). ### Impact **Who is

CVSS 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Severity from
GitHub (reviewed advisory)
Weakness
CWE-639
Also known as
CVE-2026-28788, PYSEC-2026-2742

More Open WebUI advisories

All Open WebUI