AI and data stack advisories

Severe, 6 weeks1496Projects326

1496 severe, 6 weeks · 326 projects

vLLMGHSA-3ww4-5jv9-j5gm

vLLM's Artifact Pin Decay allows pinned deployments to load unpinned code, weights, and processors

vLLM

CVE-2026-47155 · Published Jun 10, 2026 · updated Sep 10, 2026

Medium6.5
Fix: upgrade to 0.22.0 or later
GitHub advisory

Summary

vLLM's revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies --revision or --code-revision can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision.

This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision.

Details

The expected invariant is:

> When a vLLM operator supplies a model or code revision pin, every code, config, processor, weight file, side weight, and same-repository subfolder artifact loaded as part of that model should resolve under that pin unless vLLM exposes and enforces a separate explicit pin for that artifact.

Current main was verified affected at commit 3795d7acf431980e62e738493f437ae2a51549da.

Affected source boundaries:

  • vllm/model_executor/models/registry.py:1045-1051 and :1058-1064
  • _try_resolve_transformers() passes revision=model_config.revision and trust_remote_code=model_config.trust_remote_code, but omits code_revision=model_config.code_revision for external auto_map dynamic module imports.
  • vllm/model_executor/model_loader/gguf_loader.py:58-60
  • The...

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
vllm
PyPI
< 0.22.00.22.0
Details and references

### Summary vLLM's revision pinning controls do not consistently apply to all artifacts loaded for a model. A deployment that supplies `--revision` or `--code-revision` can still load dynamic code, GGUF files, image processors, retrieval side weights, or same-repository subfolder weights/config from an unpinned/default revision. This is a supply-chain integrity issue for pinned vLLM deployments. Operators can believe they are serving a reviewed model revision while vLLM resolves behavior-affecting nested or sibling artifacts outside that reviewed revision. ### Details The expected invariant is: > When a vLLM operator supplies a model or code revision pin, every code, config, processor, weight file, side weight, and same-repository subfolder artifact loaded as part of that model should resolve under that pin unless vLLM exposes and enforces a separate explicit pin for that artifact. Current `main` was verified affected at commit `3795d7acf431980e62e738493f437ae2a51549da`. Affected source boundaries: - `vllm/model_executor/models/registry.py:1045-1051` and `:1058-1064` - `_try_resolve_transformers()` passes `revision=model_config.revision` and `trust_remote_code=model_config.trust_remote_code`, but omits `code_revision=model_config.code_revision` for external `auto_map` dynamic module imports. - `vllm/model_executor/model_loader/gguf_loader.py:58-60` - The direct-file GGUF form `repo/file.gguf` calls `hf_hub_download(repo_id=repo_id, filename=filename)` without passing `revision`. - `vllm/model_executor/models/roberta.py:203-209` - BGE-M3 secondary sparse and ColBERT side weights are declared with `revision=None`. - `vllm/model_executor/models/kimi_k25.py:111-114` - Kimi-K2.5 calls `cached_get_image_processor()` without passing `model_config.revision`. - `vllm/model_executor/models/kimi_audio.py:92-95` - Kimi-Audio loads Whisper config from the `whisper-large-v3` subfolder without a `revision` argument. - `vllm/model_executor/models/kimi_audio.py:425-430` - Kimi-Audio declares same-repository `whisper-large-v3` secondary weights with `revision=None`. - `vllm/model_executor/model_loader/default_loader.py:287-301` - The default loader preserves `model_config.revision` for the primary source, then consumes model-supplied secondary sources as declared. The strongest example is Kimi-Audio: the primary `moonshotai/Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct` weights preserve the configured model revision, but the same-repository `whisper-large-v3` audio tower config/weights do not. A pinned Kimi-Audio deployment can therefore load the Whisper subfolder outside the audited revision. This report does not claim a `trust_remote_code=False` bypass, unauthenticated RCE, or real artifact compromise. The issue is improper propagation of explicit artifact pins across supported loader paths. ### Impact Affected users are operators who pin vLLM model deployments to a reviewed Hugging Face revision for safety review, provenance, rollback, or reproducibility. The impact is that the pin does not reliably describe the full set of artifacts vLLM serves. Even when the operator selects an audited revision, vLLM can resolve behavior-affecting secondary artifacts from the repository default branch or another mutable ref. Depending on the model path, the unpinned artifact can be dynamic model code, a GGUF file, an image processor, retrieval side weights, or the same-repository Kimi-Audio Whisper subfolder weights/config. This breaks the operational guarantee of a pinned deployment: "serve the exact artifact set I reviewed." A later change to an unpinned secondary artifact can alter model behavior without changing the operator's configured revision, making review, rollback, incident response, and audit records unreliable. ### Occurrences - `vllm/model_executor/models/kimi_k25.py` L111-L114 , Kimi-K2.5 loads its image processor with `cached_get_image_processor()` but does not pass `self.ctx.model_config.revision`. The processor can therefore resol

CVSS 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Severity from
GitHub (reviewed advisory)
Weakness
CWE-345
Also known as
CVE-2026-47155, PYSEC-2026-2301

More vLLM advisories

All vLLM