Skip to content
Apache AirflowPYSEC-2026-3705

Apache Airflow's secrets masker hides values stored under sensitive key names when they are displayed in the UI. The masker's recursion-depth limit did not descend into values nested inside a list, tuple, or set beyond that limit, so an Airflow Variable holding such a deeply-nested value was shown u

Medium4.3CVE-2026-54183 · Published Aug 12, 2026 · updated Aug 19, 2026

Source advisory

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
apache-airflow
PyPI
< 3.3.13.3.1
Details and references

Apache Airflow's secrets masker hides values stored under sensitive key names when they are displayed in the UI. The masker's recursion-depth limit did not descend into values nested inside a list, tuple, or set beyond that limit, so an Airflow Variable holding such a deeply-nested value was shown unmasked in the Variables UI. The exposure is limited to the UI: any authenticated user who can see the Variable in the UI can already read its full value through the Variables REST API, so this does not disclose data the user could not otherwise obtain , the masking is a shoulder-surfing defense for the UI, not an access-control boundary. This is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2026-42358, whose fix made only the dictionary walk unbounded; lists, tuples, and sets beyond the depth limit remained unmasked in the UI. Deployments that applied the CVE-2026-42358 fix should also upgrade to address this residual case. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later.

CVSS 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Severity from
the CVSS score
Also known as
BIT-airflow-2026-54183, CVE-2026-54183

More Apache Airflow advisories

All Apache Airflow
DateAdvisory
Aug 12Apache Airflow's secrets masker did not mask `var.json` Variable values whose value is a dict in the Rendered Templates UI , the dict value failed an `isinstance(str)` guard , so a secret stored as a JSON Variable and referenced in a template via `var.json` was displayed in cleartext to any user wit
CVE-2026-59244Medium6.5fixed in 3.3.1
Aug 12Apache Airflow 3.3.0 moved human-in-the-loop tasks from the triggerer to a new `awaiting_input` task state swept by the scheduler. That sweep deserializes the task instance's `next_kwargs` without an allow-list, so a Dag author , who controls that value through the task execution API , can cause an
CVE-2026-67260High7.3fixed in 3.3.1
Aug 12Apache Airflow's Task SDK rebuilt a `Callback` object from serialized data by re-running its constructor, which imports the module named by the stored callback path. Because `SyncCallback` is itself an Airflow class it passes the default `allowed_deserialization_classes` allow-list, so tightening th
CVE-2026-67587High8.8fixed in 3.3.1
Aug 12Apache Airflow's environment-variable secrets backend resolved a team-scoped Connection or Variable from the wrong team's scope. The guard meant to prevent this only ran when no team scope was supplied, and its pattern could not match a team name containing an underscore, which team names are allowe
CVE-2026-68076Medium5.4fixed in 3.3.1
Aug 12Apache Airflow's Backfill API authorized a request against a Dag id supplied by the caller whenever the `backfill_id` path segment failed to parse. The authorization dependency parsed it with `int()` while the route handler parsed it as pydantic's `NonNegativeInt`, which accepts values `int()` rejec
CVE-2026-68968High7.5fixed in 3.3.1
Aug 12Apache Airflow wrote Variable values and Connection `extra` contents to the audit log in cleartext when they were submitted through the bulk endpoints (`PATCH /api/v2/variables` and `PATCH /api/v2/connections`). The audit-log masking recognised only top-level request fields, and a bulk request nests
CVE-2026-68969Medium6.5fixed in 3.3.1

Critical advisories by email

Wednesdays: the week’s critical and high advisories in the AI and data stack, with the fixed versions. Only in weeks that have some.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.