Skip to content
TensorFlowGHSA-rh87-q4vg-m45j

TensorFlow vulnerable to integer overflow in math ops

LowCVE-2022-36015 · Published Sep 16, 2022 · updated Jul 13, 2026

### Impact When [`RangeSize`](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/core/ops/math_ops.cc) receives values that do not fit into an `int64_t`, it crashes. ```cpp auto size = (std::is_integral<T>::value ? ((Eigen::numext::abs(limit - start) + Eigen::numext::abs(delta) - T(1)) / Eigen::numext::abs(delta)) : (Eigen::numext::ceil( Eigen::numext::abs((limit - start) / delta)))); // This check does not cover all cases. if (size > std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()) { return errors::InvalidArgument("Requires ((limit - start) / delta) <= ", std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()); } c->set_output(0, c->Vector(static_cast<int64_t>(size))); return Status::OK(); } ``` ### Patches We have patched the issue in GitHub commit [37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0). The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.10.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.9.1, TensorFlow 2.8.1, and TensorFlow 2.7.2, as these are also...

GitHub advisory

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
tensorflow
PyPI
< 2.7.22.7.2
>= 2.8.0, < 2.8.12.8.1
>= 2.9.0, < 2.9.12.9.1
Details and references

### Impact When [`RangeSize`](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/core/ops/math_ops.cc) receives values that do not fit into an `int64_t`, it crashes. ```cpp auto size = (std::is_integral<T>::value ? ((Eigen::numext::abs(limit - start) + Eigen::numext::abs(delta) - T(1)) / Eigen::numext::abs(delta)) : (Eigen::numext::ceil( Eigen::numext::abs((limit - start) / delta)))); // This check does not cover all cases. if (size > std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()) { return errors::InvalidArgument("Requires ((limit - start) / delta) <= ", std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()); } c->set_output(0, c->Vector(static_cast<int64_t>(size))); return Status::OK(); } ``` ### Patches We have patched the issue in GitHub commit [37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0). The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.10.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.9.1, TensorFlow 2.8.1, and TensorFlow 2.7.2, as these are also affected and still in supported range. ### For more information Please consult [our security guide](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Severity from
GitHub (reviewed advisory)
Weakness
CWE-190
Also known as
BIT-tensorflow-2022-36015, CVE-2022-36015, PYSEC-2026-1033, PYSEC-2026-3237, PYSEC-2026-3367

More TensorFlow advisories

All TensorFlow
Advisory
TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `Save` and `SaveSlices`
Medium5.9Sep 16, 2022
TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `ParameterizedTruncatedNormal`
Medium5.9Sep 16, 2022
TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `LRNGrad`
Medium5.9Sep 16, 2022
TensorFlow vulnerable to segfault in `RaggedBincount`
Medium5.9Sep 16, 2022
TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `tf.linalg.matrix_rank`
Medium5.9Sep 16, 2022
TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `MaxPool`
Medium5.9Sep 16, 2022

Critical advisories by email

Wednesdays: the week’s critical and high advisories in the AI and data stack, with the fixed versions. Only in weeks that have some.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.