TensorFlow vulnerable to integer overflow in math ops
LowCVE-2022-36015 · Published Sep 16, 2022 · updated Jul 13, 2026
### Impact When [`RangeSize`](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/core/ops/math_ops.cc) receives values that do not fit into an `int64_t`, it crashes. ```cpp auto size = (std::is_integral<T>::value ? ((Eigen::numext::abs(limit - start) + Eigen::numext::abs(delta) - T(1)) / Eigen::numext::abs(delta)) : (Eigen::numext::ceil( Eigen::numext::abs((limit - start) / delta)))); // This check does not cover all cases. if (size > std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()) { return errors::InvalidArgument("Requires ((limit - start) / delta) <= ", std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()); } c->set_output(0, c->Vector(static_cast<int64_t>(size))); return Status::OK(); } ``` ### Patches We have patched the issue in GitHub commit [37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0). The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.10.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.9.1, TensorFlow 2.8.1, and TensorFlow 2.7.2, as these are also...
Affected versions
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| tensorflow PyPI | < 2.7.2 | 2.7.2 |
| >= 2.8.0, < 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 | |
| >= 2.9.0, < 2.9.1 | 2.9.1 |
Details and references
### Impact When [`RangeSize`](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/core/ops/math_ops.cc) receives values that do not fit into an `int64_t`, it crashes. ```cpp auto size = (std::is_integral<T>::value ? ((Eigen::numext::abs(limit - start) + Eigen::numext::abs(delta) - T(1)) / Eigen::numext::abs(delta)) : (Eigen::numext::ceil( Eigen::numext::abs((limit - start) / delta)))); // This check does not cover all cases. if (size > std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()) { return errors::InvalidArgument("Requires ((limit - start) / delta) <= ", std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max()); } c->set_output(0, c->Vector(static_cast<int64_t>(size))); return Status::OK(); } ``` ### Patches We have patched the issue in GitHub commit [37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0). The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.10.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.9.1, TensorFlow 2.8.1, and TensorFlow 2.7.2, as these are also affected and still in supported range. ### For more information Please consult [our security guide](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
- Severity from
- GitHub (reviewed advisory)
- Weakness
- CWE-190
- Also known as
- BIT-tensorflow-2022-36015, CVE-2022-36015, PYSEC-2026-1033, PYSEC-2026-3237, PYSEC-2026-3367
- github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-rh87-q4vg-m45j
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36015
- github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/37e64539cd29fcfb814c4451152a60f5d107b0f0
- github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow
- github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/core/ops/math_ops.cc
- github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.10.0
More TensorFlow advisories
All TensorFlow| Date | Advisory | Severity | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 162022 | TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `Save` and `SaveSlices` | Medium5.9 | 2.7.2+2 more |
| Sep 162022 | TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `ParameterizedTruncatedNormal` | Medium5.9 | 2.7.2+2 more |
| Sep 162022 | TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `LRNGrad` | Medium5.9 | 2.7.2+2 more |
| Sep 162022 | TensorFlow vulnerable to segfault in `RaggedBincount` | Medium5.9 | 2.7.2+2 more |
| Sep 162022 | TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `tf.linalg.matrix_rank` | Medium5.9 | 2.7.2+2 more |
| Sep 162022 | TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `MaxPool` | Medium5.9 | 2.7.2+2 more |