Skip to content
LMDeployGHSA-9xq9-36w5-q796

lmdeploy: Hardcoded trust_remote_code=True is an implicit unsafe remote-code load path with no user opt-out

High7.8CVE-2026-46517 ยท Published May 21, 2026 ยท updated Sep 15, 2026

GitHub advisory

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
lmdeploy
PyPI
< 0.13.00.13.0
Details and references

> ## ๐Ÿ“‹ Reframing (2026-05-02): implicit unsafe remote-code path, not "supply-chain" > > The accurate description of this vulnerability is: > **"`get_model_arch` and related helpers hardcode `trust_remote_code=True` > with no opt-out, creating an implicit unsafe remote-code load path > on every model fetch."** > > What this report does NOT claim: > * It is NOT a network-attack RCE , the user supplies the model > reference; LMDeploy honors it. > * It is NOT a "supply chain" CVE in the classical sense (where a > benign upstream is compromised) , the user explicitly types the > repo name. > > What this report DOES claim: > * Other inference frameworks (vLLM, TGI, Hugging Face transformers > itself) all expose `--trust-remote-code` as **opt-in** so that > users who consciously load known-safe repos can opt in, while > users following a tutorial cannot accidentally execute attacker > Python by typing a wrong repo name. > * LMDeploy's hardcoded True is an **implicit** trust-boundary > override that violates HF Transformers' default-secure stance > (`trust_remote_code=False` since transformers โ‰ฅ 4.30). > * The fix is a one-line CLI flag (`--trust-remote-code`) defaulting > False, threaded through the three sites, matching the rest of > the ecosystem. > > Severity should be assessed as **hardening / safe-by-default**, > not as full unauthenticated RCE. CVSS revised to **5.5 Medium** > (`AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H` ร— user-must-load qualifier). > > Runtime evidence: see `12_lmdeploy_trust_remote_code_F13/runtime_evidence/cloudrun_cpu_verdict.txt`. --- # F13 , LMDeploy: hardcoded `trust_remote_code=True` enables HF supply-chain RCE without user opt-in **Reporter:** ibondarenko1 / sactransport2000@gmail.com **Coordinated-disclosure window:** 90 days from initial vendor email. ## TL;DR LMDeploy unilaterally passes `trust_remote_code=True` to `transformers.AutoConfig.from_pretrained()` (and several other `from_pretrained` callers) **regardless of any user opt-in**. The flag is hardcoded `True` in source , there is no CLI flag, no environment variable, no parameter, and no warning that lets a user refuse remote code execution from the model repository. This is a **silent override of HuggingFace Transformers' own default-secure stance** (`trust_remote_code=False`) introduced in HF Transformers โ‰ฅ 4.30 specifically to prevent this class of supply-chain RCE. The user running `lmdeploy serve api_server <attacker_repo>`, `lmdeploy lite calibrate <attacker_repo>`, etc. has **no way to opt out**. The only escape hatch is for the user to never load any third-party HF repo with LMDeploy , which is incompatible with LMDeploy's documented use case. HuggingFace's `trust_remote_code=False` default exists exactly to prevent silent RCE when loading a third-party repo. LMDeploy overrides this default, restoring the unsafe behaviour transparently. A malicious HF repo with a `configuration_*.py` shim runs Python code as the LMDeploy user at the very first call to `get_model_arch(...)`. This is a documented anti-pattern (see HF Hub docs: "Trusting custom code is therefore tricky..."). Multiple peer projects fixed similar issues , e.g. Hugging Face Transformers itself made this opt-in by default, and `vllm` exposes the flag through `--trust-remote-code` rather than hardcoding it. ## Affected version * Repository: `github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy`, branch `main`. * Branch SHA at audit time: `9df0eff7c38ae69b9d4b9f7ad1441e484d439f92` (2026-05-02). * Pinned blob SHAs: * `lmdeploy/archs.py` โ†’ `68fa03a407734be1e2ae04098d34e9acdbe98262` * `lmdeploy/lite/apis/calibrate.py` โ†’ `0728304bdc3c03eee1d790bfbd5496df080a0ecd` * `lmdeploy/lite/utils/load.py` โ†’ `7c61677aa01e2d9881e32f8ca8ef6ad0f1d8b120` * `lmdeploy/pytorch/check_env/model.py` โ†’ `b1a2daaa426bf5fe25030f7913c703eed9f5b261` Snapshots of all four files are in `source_pinned/`. ## Source-level evidence ### Site 1 , architecture detection (every load

CVSS 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Severity from
GitHub (reviewed advisory)
Weakness
CWE-1188, CWE-915, CWE-94
Also known as
CVE-2026-46517, PYSEC-2026-2608

More LMDeploy advisories

All LMDeploy
DateAdvisory
May 21LMDeploy: Arbitrary code execution via hardcoded trust_remote_code=True in lmdeploy model initialization
CVE-2026-46432High7.8fixed in 0.13.0
Apr 21LMDeploy has Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Vision-Language Image Loading
CVE-2026-33626High7.5no fix yet
Sep 16LMdeploy has Remote Code Execution by Pickle Deserialization via zmq_rpc.call_and_response() in InterLM/lmdeploy
CVE-2025-59953Critical9.8fixed in 0.10.2
Sep 18LMDeploy has Remote Code Execution by Pickle Deserialization via handle_zmq_recv in lmdeploy/lmdeploy/pytorch/disagg/conn/engine_conn.py
CVE-2025-66455Critical9.8fixed in 0.16.0
Sep 18LMDeploy vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via eval() of untrusted quant_dtype in model config loading
CVE-2026-33625High8.8fixed in 0.12.3
Sep 18LMDeploy has an SSRF bypass
GHSA-39wr-7q6h-cf68High7.5fixed in 0.15.0

Critical advisories by email

Wednesdays: the weekโ€™s critical and high advisories in the AI and data stack, with the fixed versions. Only in weeks that have some.

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe any time.